Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13 |
| 2021-07-29 | -- |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | -- |
| 10.02 ounces | -- |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A34 has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Nokia XR20's overall score of 80.8. The Samsung Galaxy A34 is a noticeably thinner and extremely lighter device than Nokia XR20. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy A34 has newer 13 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features.
The Nokia XR20 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A34, because although it has a little lower pixels amount in each inch in the screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a bit larger display. Samsung Galaxy A34 has a bit better performance than Nokia XR20, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A34, although it has a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality videos and images, they both have the same aperture and a same resolution back facing camera. The Nokia XR20 features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A34 has a bit superior battery life than Nokia XR20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4630mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.