Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, with a general score of 80.8 against 79.4. Despite being the best phone we compare here, the Nokia XR20 body is notably older, extremely heavier and much thicker than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia XR20 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14.
Nokia XR20 has a little sharper screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has a bit larger display, a little bit better display pixel density, a little more brightness and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution. Nokia XR20 has a superior memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Nokia XR20 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB.
Nokia XR20 counts with a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also has a way better video definition, a bigger back camera sensor and a higher resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has a bit superior battery performance than Nokia XR20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.