Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Nokia XR20, having a score of 83.8 against 80.8. Even though the Galaxy A50 is incredibly older than the Nokia XR20, it's design is notably lighter and notably thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a little better performance than Nokia XR20, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
The Nokia XR20 has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite worse display density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Nokia XR20 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP, better 60 fps video frame rate and a larger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy A50 has as much storage for games and applications as Nokia XR20, they have an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and equal 128 GB internal memory. Nokia XR20 has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Galaxy A50 is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.