Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Nokia XR20, with a 91.1 score against 80.8. Samsung Galaxy A52s is a thinner and extremely lighter device than the Nokia XR20, even when both of them were released with only 1 months difference. Both phones in our current comparison work with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so both of them should provide the user all the same OS features.
Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A52s, because although it has a just a little inferior pixel quantity in each screen inch, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400px resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a quite bigger screen. The Galaxy A52s features a bit superior CPU than Nokia XR20. They have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy A52s captures much clearer videos and photos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Galaxy A52s also has a camera with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution, a way higher 3840x2160 video definition and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s has slightly more memory for games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52s also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1 TB. The Nokia XR20 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52s, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.