Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic and Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 is a bit better than the Galaxy A6, with a global score of 80.8 against 75.8. The Nokia XR20 construction is incredibly newer, but a lot heavier and noticeably thicker than the Galaxy A6. Nokia XR20 has a brighter screen than Galaxy A6, because it has a higher screen pixel density, a much higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a larger display.
The Nokia XR20 has just a bit better performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Nokia XR20 also has more RAM memory. Nokia XR20 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low-light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rates, a much better resolution camera and a bigger camera sensor which offers a better photo and video quality.
Nokia XR20 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A6, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A6. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Nokia XR20, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Galaxy A6, resigning some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.