Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy A70's 76.9 global score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia XR20 has a more recent 11 version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. The Nokia XR20 construction is notably newer, but noticeably heavier and much thicker than the Galaxy A70.
The Galaxy A70 and Nokia XR20 count with similar processing units, they have a Octa-Core CPU and a 6 GB RAM. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A70. Both have a screen with the same size, exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a higher amount of pixels per screen inch.
Nokia XR20 takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A70, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality pictures and faster video frame rate.
The Galaxy A70 counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Nokia XR20, they have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A70. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy A70, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.