Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is a bit better than Nokia XR20's global score of 80.8. The Galaxy F62 is a lighter and somewhat thinner phone than the Nokia XR20, although both were only released 5 months apart. These phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding that.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a little better processing power than Nokia XR20, although it has 4 less CPU cores (although faster), they both have a 6 GB RAM. Nokia XR20 counts with a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, a same size display and a better pixel amount per inch of screen, the Nokia XR20 also has more brightness.
The Galaxy F62 takes much clearer videos and photos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy F62 also has a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a way better resolution. The Galaxy F62 features a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a very superior battery duration than Nokia XR20, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.