Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-07-29 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than the Nokia XR20's general score of 80.8. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is noticeably thinner and a little lighter than the Nokia XR20, although it was released only 22 months before. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11, providing the user some extra features and increased performance.
Galaxy Fold features a little faster processing unit than Nokia XR20, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 6 GB more RAM. Nokia XR20 features a bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater display density.
Galaxy Fold has a superior storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia XR20, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage. Nokia XR20 features just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4630mAh battery size.
The Nokia XR20 takes a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low-light photography, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality pictures and a camera with way more mega-pixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Nokia XR20. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Nokia XR20, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.