Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an overall score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Nokia XR20's 80.8 overall score. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is older than Nokia XR20, it's design is incredibly lighter and thinner. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the newer 13 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version, so it counts with a couple additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little bit better looking display than Nokia XR20, because it has a better pixel number in each inch of screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has more RAM.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit bigger storage to store more apps and games than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a way better 108 mega pixels resolution back camera.
Nokia XR20 features a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs a lot more than the Nokia XR20, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.