Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is slightly better than the Nokia XR20, with a general score of 81.2 against 80.8. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the older 5.0 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is an way older cellphone than Nokia XR20, but it's much thinner and lighter anyway.
Galaxy Note 3 counts with a little faster processing unit than Nokia XR20, because although it has less RAM and 4 less cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. Galaxy Note 3 features a bit better looking screen than Nokia XR20, although it has a quite lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, a quite smaller display and a little inferior pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Nokia XR20 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also has a lot bigger camera sensor which provides a lot higher image and video quality, a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos, higher video frame rate and a back camera with a way higher resolution.
Nokia XR20 features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 3, because it has a 45 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.