Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having a score of 80.8 against 80.4. Nokia XR20 is a way newer phone than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, although it is extremely thicker and much heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a bit sharper screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater screen pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a bit faster CPU than Nokia XR20, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores. Nokia XR20 has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Nokia XR20 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates, a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality and a much more mega pixels camera.
The Nokia XR20 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 45% more battery capacity.
Nokia XR20 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.