Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, getting a overall score of 80.8 against 77.7. Both phones we compare here work with Android operating system, but the Nokia XR20 has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. The Nokia XR20 design is incredibly newer than the Samsung Galaxy Note3's, but it is way thicker and extremely heavier.
The Nokia XR20 has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3 GB more RAM and more processing cores (although slower). Nokia XR20 features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite better 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, a little bit greater display pixel density and a larger display.
Nokia XR20 captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Nokia XR20 also has a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture to take better photos in low-light situations and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage. The Nokia XR20 features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.