Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a global score of 94.8, which is much better than Nokia XR20's 80.8 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy S20 is older than Nokia XR20, it's design is notably thinner and lighter. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more recent 13 version while Nokia XR20 has Android 11, giving some nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a bit better screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a slightly better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Galaxy S20 features just a little better performance than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S20 also has a larger amount of RAM. Nokia XR20 captures clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S20, because although it has a lot smaller sensor, and they both have a same size aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with faster video frame rate and a camera in the back with lot more MP.
Nokia XR20 features a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S20, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 costs a lot more money than the Nokia XR20, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.