Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Nokia XR20, getting a 95.4 score against 80.8. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Nokia XR20, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. Both phones we are comparing work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version, giving you some additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than Nokia XR20, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a better count of pixels per inch in the screen, a bit bigger screen and a much brighter screen. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia XR20, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Nokia XR20 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Nokia XR20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better video definition, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit longer battery duration than Nokia XR20, because it has an 8 percent more battery size.
Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than Nokia XR20, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.