Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-07-29 | -- |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | -- |
| 10.02 ounces | -- |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 is a little bit better than the Nokia XR20, having a score of 82.6 against 80.8. Samsung Galaxy S25's construction is incredibly thinner and way lighter than the Nokia XR20. Both phones we compare here include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S25 has a newer 14 version while Nokia XR20 has Android 11, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
Nokia XR20 features a much powerful CPU than Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy S25 counts with a better looking screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a bit smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a quite better pixels density and much more display brightness.
Galaxy S25 features a superior camera than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S25 also has a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a better resolution back camera and a much better video resolution. The Nokia XR20 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia XR20 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Nokia XR20 has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has a 16 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Nokia XR20. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Nokia XR20, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.