Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-07-29 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's overall score of 75.8. The Nokia XR20 is a way newer device than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's extremely heavier and a little bit thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a slightly better screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a much smaller display and less brightness, it also counts with a higher display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Nokia XR20 counts with much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Nokia XR20 features just a little better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 2 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores.
Nokia XR20 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera and faster video frame rate. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4630mAh of battery capacity.
Although Nokia XR20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Nokia XR20, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.