Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 80.8 score against 80.1. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia XR20 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Nokia XR20 is a newer and incredibly thinner device than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it's also just a little bit heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Nokia XR20, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Nokia XR20 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has 64 GB more internal storage. The Nokia XR20 features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a larger back camera sensor.
The Nokia XR20 has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Nokia XR20 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.