Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 550.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.48 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover Pro is a bit better than the Nokia XR20, with a global score of 81 against 80.8. Even though the Galaxy XCover Pro is older than Nokia XR20, it's design is a lot lighter and a bit thinner. Both of these devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system). The Nokia XR20 has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little inferior number of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit larger display.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has just a bit better processing power than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Nokia XR20 counts with a much greater memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Nokia XR20 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a way higher 48 MP resolution back camera, a lot bigger sensor and higher 60 frames per second video frame rate.
Nokia XR20 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 14% larger battery size.
The Galaxy XCover Pro not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.