Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2021-07-29 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Granite Gre and Ultra Blue | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 550.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 550 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4630mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.48 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is a bit better than the Nokia XR20's general score of 80.8. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version and Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older device than the Nokia XR20, but it is noticeably thinner and way lighter anyway.
Nokia XR20 has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit worse display pixels density and a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a screen with the same size. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better CPU than Nokia XR20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Nokia XR20 takes a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the same (Full HD) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Nokia XR20 also has a camera with a way better resolution and a larger camera sensor capturing better quality photos and videos.
The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia XR20 counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4630mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Nokia XR20. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy the Nokia XR20, and give up a couple features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.