Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2023-07-11 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the Nothing Phone (2), getting an 80 score against 75.6. Although the Google Pixel 3 is way older than Nothing Phone (2), it's design is incredibly lighter and just a little thinner. The Nothing Phone (2) features a slightly better looking screen than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a little bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2412px and a bigger display.
The Nothing Phone (2) features a bit better performance than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nothing Phone (2) also has more RAM. Nothing Phone (2) shoots much clearer photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nothing Phone (2) also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera, better 60 fps video frame rate and a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality.
The Nothing Phone (2) counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal storage. Nothing Phone (2) counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 4700mAh battery size against 2915mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.