Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-07-11 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| -- | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is slightly better than Nothing Phone (2), with a 78.8 score against 75.6. The Google Pixel 3a is an a lot older phone than Nothing Phone (2), but Google was able to make it a little bit thinner and way lighter anyway. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 3a has older 11 version and Nothing Phone (2) has Android 12.
Nothing Phone (2) features just a bit better display than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2412px. Nothing Phone (2) features a much better memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 3a, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Nothing Phone (2) has a bit faster processor than Google Pixel 3a, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Nothing Phone (2) also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Nothing Phone (2) counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3a, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
The Nothing Phone (2) counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Nothing Phone (2) also counts with faster video frame rate, a much larger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.