Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-07-11 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a is a little bit better than the Nothing Phone (2), getting an 82.9 score against 75.6. Google Pixel 4a is an much older phone than Nothing Phone (2), but it's lighter and just a bit thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a has the previous 11 version while Nothing Phone (2) has Android 12 version.
Nothing Phone (2) features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2412 resolution. Nothing Phone (2) has a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Nothing Phone (2) also has a greater amount of RAM.
Nothing Phone (2) shoots way better pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Nothing Phone (2) also counts with a camera in the back with a way better resolution, a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
Google Pixel 4a and Nothing Phone (2) count with incredibly similar memory to store more games and applications, they have exactly the same internal storage. The Nothing Phone (2) features a really longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.