Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2023-07-11 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| -- | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 is better than Nothing Phone (2), with an 89 score against 75.6. Google Pixel 5's design is just a bit thinner and noticeably lighter than Nothing Phone (2), although it was released many years before. The Nothing Phone (2) has a bit better performance than Google Pixel 5. Both have a Octa-Core CPU and 8 GB of RAM.
Nothing Phone (2) counts with a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a just a little lower count of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a little bit higher 1080 x 2412 resolution. The Nothing Phone (2) takes much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Nothing Phone (2) also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution and a much larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
Google Pixel 5 has as much memory to install applications and games as the Nothing Phone (2), both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity. Nothing Phone (2) features a little better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity against 4080mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.