Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2023-07-11 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| -- | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the Nothing Phone (2)'s 75.6 general score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's design has the same thickness than Nothing Phone (2), but it's just a little lighter. These phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has newer 14 version while Nothing Phone (2) has Android 12 version.
The Nothing Phone (2) features a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a bit sharper screen than Nothing Phone (2), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little bit worse pixels count in each screen inch, and they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with way more brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes slightly better videos and photos than Nothing Phone (2), and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a 50 megapixels resolution back camera, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a better image and video quality.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Nothing Phone (2), because it has 384 GB more internal storage capacity. The Nothing Phone (2) counts with a little better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has a 4% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.