Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2023-07-11 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 is much better than Nothing Phone (2), having a overall score of 90.7 against 75.6. Despite of the fact that the Samsung Galaxy A52 is incredibly older than Nothing Phone (2), it's design is a bit lighter and a bit thinner. Nothing Phone (2) has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nothing Phone (2) also has a higher amount of RAM.
Nothing Phone (2) features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a quite lower screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2412 pixels and a little bigger screen. The Galaxy A52 counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Nothing Phone (2), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Nothing Phone (2) has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A52, because it has a 4 percent greater battery capacity. Galaxy A52 takes slightly better videos and photos than Nothing Phone (2), because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and pictures and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low-light situations and a way better 64 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.