Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2023-07-11 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is way better than the Nothing Phone (2), getting a general score of 91.3 against 75.6. Both of these phones include the same Android 12 operating system, so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G design is just a little thinner and a little lighter than Nothing Phone (2), even though it was released many years before.
Nothing Phone (2) features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nothing Phone (2) also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Nothing Phone (2) has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a little bit inferior pixels amount per display inch, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2412 and a little bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a superior memory to install applications and games than Nothing Phone (2), and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A52 5G captures clearer photographs and videos than Nothing Phone (2), because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a tinier sensor which provides a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a larger aperture and a way more MP back-facing camera.
Nothing Phone (2) features a little better battery life than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.