Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2023-07-11 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| -- | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 394 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.56 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Nothing Phone (2), having a 97.6 score against 75.6. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a notably older and noticeably heavier cellphone than the Nothing Phone (2), but Samsung was able to build it thinner anyway. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Nothing Phone (2) has Android 12, so it provides you some nice extra features.
The Nothing Phone (2) features a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2412px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Nothing Phone (2), because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Nothing Phone (2) features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Fold, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Nothing Phone (2) takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Nothing Phone (2) also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera in the back and a much larger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and videos.
The Nothing Phone (2) has a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 7 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.