Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2023-07-11 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.38 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.10 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2412 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 394 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4700mAh Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.56 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than Nothing Phone (2), getting a global score of 81 against 75.6. These devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover Pro has the older 11 version while Nothing Phone (2) has Android 12. Although it's the best device in this comparison review, the Galaxy XCover Pro design is notably older, a little heavier and thicker than the Nothing Phone (2).
Nothing Phone (2) counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nothing Phone (2) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nothing Phone (2) counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a just a little worse quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2412 pixels.
The Nothing Phone (2) has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with a much better 50 mega-pixels resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Nothing Phone (2), because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Nothing Phone (2) has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.