Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63 | 69 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.0, 4.4.3, 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 |
| 2016-07-04 | 2013-02-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.41 x 2.69 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Red and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 255.00 | $ 163.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 401 pixels per inch | 469 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 600 APQ8064T chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 300 (Quad-Core 1700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 320 (400 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 4.00 MP + 2.10 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 768 x 432 (96 fps) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2300mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 461 hours standby time 18 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One is slightly better than the nubia N1, having a 69 score against 63. The HTC One design is lighter than nubia N1, but it's just a little bit thicker and was released many years before. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but HTC One has older 5.0 version while nubia N1 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The nubia N1 features a bit faster processor than HTC One, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and more RAM. The HTC One features a bit better display than nubia N1, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1920 x 1080px, the HTC One also counts with a just a little greater pixels density.
Nubia N1 features a way bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 128 GB. The nubia N1 has a bit better camera than HTC One, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the nubia N1 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution.
The nubia N1 has a way better battery performance than HTC One, because it has a 117% greater battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the HTC One is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.