Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 63 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-07-04 | 2017-08-11 |
| 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.70 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 255.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P10 MT6755 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T860 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 Active is a lot better than nubia N1, having an 81.9 score against 63. Even though Galaxy S8 Active is newer than the nubia N1, it's a bit heavier and thicker. Galaxy S8 Active has a bit more powerful CPU than nubia N1, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S8 Active also has more RAM.
Galaxy S8 Active has a much better looking screen than nubia N1, because it has a higher display pixel density, a little bit bigger display and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than nubia N1, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The nubia N1 counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 25% greater battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active shoots a bit better photos and videos than nubia N1, because although it has a camera in the back with less MP, it also counts with a much bigger aperture and a much better video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy S8 Active is also cheaper than the nubia N1.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.