Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and Red | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X has a global score of 88.1, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. IPhone X is an older cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's extremely thinner and lighter anyway. Apple iPhone X features a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit greater pixel density.
Apple iPhone X's storage to store more apps and games is very similar to nubia Red Magic 3's one, both have equal 256 GB internal storage. Apple iPhone X has just a little better performance than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has 2 less and slower cpu cores and 9 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Nubia Red Magic 3 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Apple iPhone X, because it has a much larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture to capture better low light captures and video, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
IPhone X costs a lot more money than the nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.