Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black and Red | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is better than the nubia Red Magic 3, getting an 84.2 score against 75.6. Apple iPhone XS is a lighter and a lot thinner cellphone than nubia Red Magic 3, although they were only released 8 months apart. Apple iPhone XS has a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1125 x 2436px resolution and a bit higher display pixel density.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone XS, because it has 256 GB internal storage. IPhone XS has a bit more powerful processor than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and also slower, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
Nubia Red Magic 3 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because it has a larger camera aperture, a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a much bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photos and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone XS is way more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.