Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-12-11 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a score of 77.4, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3's general score of 75.6. Both devices we compare here include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so both of them should give you identical OS features. Even when the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) and the nubia Red Magic 3 were released only a couple months apart, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) is thinner and somewhat lighter.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) counts with a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s battery life is very similar to the battery life in nubia Red Magic 3.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture, a much bigger sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality and a much more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.