Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Red | Blue and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6 has an overall score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 score. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Nexus 6 has older 5.1 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Even though Google Nexus 6 is incredibly older and just a bit thicker than nubia Red Magic 3, it's construction is still lighter.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Google Nexus 6 features a better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixels density.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has 192 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a way better camera than Google Nexus 6, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a very superior battery life than Google Nexus 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3220mAh.
Although Google Nexus 6 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the nubia Red Magic 3. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get nubia Red Magic 3, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.