Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3 is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3, getting a general score of 80 against 75.6. Google Pixel 3 is a notably lighter and thinner phone than the nubia Red Magic 3, even though they were released only a couple of months apart. Google Pixel 3 has a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better CPU than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has a superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a lot better camera than Google Pixel 3, because it has a camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution, a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger aperture to capture better images in low-light situations and a much bigger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs.
Google Pixel 3 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.