Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 XL has a global score of 80.7, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. Google Pixel 3 XL's design is somewhat lighter and thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3, even when they were released only 7 months apart. The Google Pixel 3 XL has a little bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a superior storage to store more games and applications than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has more internal memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality, a bigger aperture to capture better photography in low light situations and a way better video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Google Pixel 3 XL is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.