Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Red | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3, with a global score of 81.9 against 75.6. Even though the Google Pixel 4 and nubia Red Magic 3 were only released with a few months difference, the Google Pixel 4 is thinner and extremely lighter. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM.
Google Pixel 4 counts with just a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better pixel number in each inch in the screen. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a much better battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2800mAh. Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots way better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 4, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way better video definition, a much larger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a much more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 4 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.