Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Red | Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3's overall score of 75.6. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 4a has older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Google Pixel 4a is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and extremely lighter than nubia Red Magic 3.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a counts with just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Google Pixel 4a also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than Google Pixel 4a, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a very superior camera than Google Pixel 4a, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way higher resolution back facing camera, a much bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a very superior battery performance than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 4a is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.