Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Red | Clearly white and Just black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is much better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting an 87.5 score against 75.6. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. Google Pixel 4a 5G is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3.
Google Pixel 4a 5G has a little sharper display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also counts with a just a little greater pixel density. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 features a bit more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a much more MP camera in the back, a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a much better video definition.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features greater battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, Google Pixel 4a 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.