Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black and Red | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 5 has a global score of 89, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3's global score of 75.6. Google Pixel 5's design is newer, lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little bit better performance than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with a little bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Google Pixel 5 also counts with a little higher pixels density. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 5, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has better battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 23% larger battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a better camera than Google Pixel 5, and although they both have a same size aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a much bigger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality and a way better 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
Google Pixel 5 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.