Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black and Red | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting a score of 77 against 75.6. These phones come with Android OS, but Honor 50 Pro has an older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. The Honor 50 Pro construction is newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than nubia Red Magic 3.
Honor 50 Pro features just a bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have a same size screen, the Honor 50 Pro also has a little better screen pixels density and a bit higher 1236 x 2676px resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3 and Honor 50 Pro both count with really similar storage capacity for apps and games, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3 has just a little better hardware performance than Honor 50 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 4 GB more RAM. Honor 50 Pro captures just a bit better pictures and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low light photos and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Honor 50 Pro also counts with better video frame rate and a camera in the back with a way higher 108 mega pixels resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has better battery duration than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.