Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black and Red | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| AMOLED | LTPO |
| 385 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a general score of 92.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3's general score of 75.6. Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a little heavier than the nubia Red Magic 3, it's just a bit thinner and newer. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has older 14 version and nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with an incredibly better display than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a little greater screen pixels density, a better resolution of 1280 x 2800 and a bit larger display. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features just a bit better performance than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a larger amount of RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has 1 TB internal storage capacity. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 3, and although they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a better resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, faster video frame rates and a larger aperture.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has just a bit longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a 5600mAh battery size instead of 5000mAh.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design costs a lot more money than nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.