Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The HTC U11 is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting a 77.6 score against 75.6. HTC U11's body is thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3, even though it was released 2 years before. The HTC U11 has a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a little better hardware performance than HTC U11, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The nubia Red Magic 3 has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than HTC U11, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The nubia Red Magic 3 captures greater videos and photos than HTC U11, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a lot more mega pixels back camera, a lot better video resolution and a way larger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality.
The HTC U11 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.