Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 91.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Huawei | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.35 x 5.76 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 10.58 ounces |
| Black and Red | Interstellar blue |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2860 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MP16 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 40.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.56 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Huawei Mate Xs has a general score of 91.6, which is way better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 general score. The Huawei Mate Xs body is newer, but a lot heavier and somewhat thicker than the nubia Red Magic 3. The nubia Red Magic 3 has just a little better processing power than Huawei Mate Xs, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Huawei Mate Xs has a bit better display than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has a bigger screen, a much better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a superior camera than Huawei Mate Xs, because although it has a smaller camera sensor taking less light and dull colors, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light captures and video, a back facing camera with a better 48 megapixels resolution and a much better video quality.
The Huawei Mate Xs features a very superior storage capacity to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because it has more internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little longer battery performance than Huawei Mate Xs, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.