Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Red | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 Fit has a score of 77, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3's 75.6 score. The LG G7 Fit is a a lot lighter and somewhat thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3, even though both were released with only 7 months difference. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G7 Fit has the older 8.1 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a brighter screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 and a higher screen pixel density. Nubia Red Magic 3 has a little better hardware performance than LG G7 Fit, because it has a larger amount of RAM and 4 more cores.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with just a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than LG G7 Fit, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 3 captures much better pictures and videos than LG G7 Fit, because it has a lot larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, a much better video definition, a lot larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations and a lot more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.