Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black and Red | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, with an 81 score against 75.6. Both phones in this comparison use the same Android 9.0 Pie OS (operating system), so both should offer the same operating system features. Although LG G7 ThinQ is older than the nubia Red Magic 3, it's design is way lighter and thinner.
LG G7 ThinQ features a brighter screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and a better pixels density. The LG G7 ThinQ features a better memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better processor than LG G7 ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 3 captures better pictures and videos than LG G7 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a way more MP camera and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a much better battery performance than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, LG G7 ThinQ is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.