Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-05-27 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Red | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3, having an 82.7 score against 75.6. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8X ThinQ has the previous 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Even when LG G8X ThinQ and nubia Red Magic 3 were released only 5 months apart, LG G8X ThinQ is somewhat thinner and lighter.
The LG G8X ThinQ counts with a bit more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the LG G8X ThinQ also counts with a little bit greater pixels number in each inch of screen. LG G8X ThinQ counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 3 has a bit better CPU than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 3 has better battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3 shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has a way more MP back-facing camera, a way larger back camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger aperture.
Even being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the LG G8X ThinQ is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.