Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Black and Red | Titan gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG K92 is much better than nubia Red Magic 3, with an 85.4 score against 75.6. Both of these phones have Android OS, but LG K92 has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. LG K92 is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a little lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 3.
Nubia Red Magic 3 features a slightly better looking screen than LG K92, although it has a just a little worse pixels density and a little worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, they both have a display with the same size. The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit faster processor than LG K92, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3 shoots slightly better photos and videos than LG K92, because although it has a way less MP back facing camera, and they both have a 0.5 inches back camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3 also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The LG K92 features a way bigger memory for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Red Magic 3 features superior battery performance than LG K92, because it has a 25% larger battery capacity.
The LG K92 is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.