Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-05-27 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black and Red | Holographic white |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Stylo 6 is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3, having a 76.7 score against 75.6. Both of these devices use Android OS, but the LG Stylo 6 has 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie version. The LG Stylo 6 is a newer and thinner phone than the nubia Red Magic 3, although it's also a bit heavier.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a bit superior processing unit than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG Stylo 6 and nubia Red Magic 3 both count with incredibly similar displays, although the LG Stylo 6 also has a quite larger display, a slightly better 1080 x 2460px resolution and a just a bit higher screen pixel density.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3 features improved battery life than LG Stylo 6, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a lot better camera than LG Stylo 6, because it has a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way higher quality pictures, a much higher video quality, a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a larger aperture for better low light photos and videos.
The LG Stylo 6 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.