Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-05-27 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Red | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3, getting a global score of 82.5 against 75.6. The LG V30S ThinQ is an older phone than the nubia Red Magic 3, but LG made it way thinner and lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but LG V30S ThinQ has an older 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3 counts with a little faster processing unit than LG V30S ThinQ, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3 also has 6 GB more RAM memory. LG V30S ThinQ features a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2880 pixels resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3 captures greater pictures and videos than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for taking images or videos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot larger sensor which provides a much higher image and video quality, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with much more mega-pixels.
The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Nubia Red Magic 3 features a very superior battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent larger battery size.
LG V30S ThinQ costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 3, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.